Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automatic Static
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 22:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Automatic Static (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Non-notable artist, signed to a label which is itself currently the subject of another AfD. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 04:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 04:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Update. The AfD on the label has now been closed as delete. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - far from meeting notability criteria. The band's only release is an EP, no recognition for it is quoted. Even if the label was considered notable (which is under discussion at the moment), this wouldn't make all the acts signed to them automatically notable. McMarcoP (talk) 09:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable band. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 20:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.