[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayisha Fuseini

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This has been listed for nearly a month. While some of the !votes are weak, the consensus is still heavily on the keep side. It also appears that the article has been significantly edited since being nominated and the nominators concerns have been addressed in those edits. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 03:41, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ayisha Fuseini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has won an award but not a notable one. A search brings out a few passing mentions from reliable sources but nothing WP:SIGCOV.

Fails WP:GNG and WP:TOOSOON Lapablo (talk) 08:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, this article is just barley acceptable of inclusion. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 07:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Good job @MarkH21: for finding those. Yes, Global Cosmetic News is not a blog. For some reason I'm now having technical problems with my computer. Hope it's a temporary issue. Could someone kindly add the sources to the article?Tamsier (talk) 11:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. I've done it.Tamsier (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.