Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BNS Durdondo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn following finding of reliable source. Mjroots (talk) 18:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BNS Durdondo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Non-notable navel vessel. Two of the three refs are link dead and the third doesn't mention the subject. Some stuff in google, but nothing reliable. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)~~ Withdraw per reliable source found by User:Worldbruce. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The three links are now working. The sources describe pennant number P-8128 as BNS Dordanda, so the title of the article may be incorrect. It may be a case of different ways to transliterate a Bengali name. Worldbruce (talk) 09:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: As the links are repaired, article should be kept. And for spelling controversy, Dordanda and Durdondo have the same pronunciation in Bangla. Sf-000 (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The problems seem to be fixed so I suppose there's no need to delete the article. I'd suggest a rename if the website seems to be using BNS Dordanda. – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 23:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note the links have been repaired to https://web.archive.org URLs, but none of these sites are reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:36, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In the absence of a deletion sorting for ships, I've pinged WikiProject Ships for their input. Worldbruce (talk) 00:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Precedent suggests a strong consensus favoring presumptive notability for named warships. I cannot remember an AfD that resulted in the deletion of an article about a named warship that was proven to exist. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ad Orientem I'm happy to withdraw my nomination if there's a reliable source which can be used to prove this ship exists, but I'm not seeing one. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Stuartyeates. See this list. The website appears to be pretty authoritative on all matters pertaining to the Bangladesh Armed Forces. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page 11 of this US Department of State budget document for 2014 includes a line item for one student from the BNS Dordanda taking the course "OJT-Cutter Transfer Training (High Endurance Cutter)" at Coast Guard PACAREA Alameda, California. Worldbruce (talk) 08:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.