Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banaut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗plicit 13:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Banaut

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is very little substantial data available wrt it, the clan also seems to be non-notable with almost nil concrete academic references available which are not WP:RAJ, WP:RSCASTE , I am not sure if this meets WP: Notability, the article is also created by a user whose many articles got deleted in the past.Akalanka820 (talk) 10:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, Bihar, and Jharkhand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sources adequately talk about the subject to establish notability. Groups of people are generally notable.--PiccklePiclePikel (talk) 15:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see most refs are under WP:RAJ, WP:RSCASTE, with not much adequate proper detail about it and this is being described as a clan of a community, lately such non-notable clan pages were deleted. The basic thing here is meeting the WP:N, and details. Lots of pages of the creator of this article was deleted in the past as well. I think in line with all of it, this is the best step. Akalanka820 (talk) 10:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We might need to un-delete some of those articles in that case. PiccklePiclePikel (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:N, then argue. A lot of those articles created by the concerned editor got deleted based on it. Akalanka820 (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If those other articles used proper source material as this article has, then they should probably not have been deleted. Wikipedia is not a place where small ethnic groups that have significant reliable coverage should me excluded. PiccklePiclePikel (talk) 12:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The issue here is also significant reliable coverage, you need to understand the meaning of it and then come up with an argument. And this is not ethnic group, but non-notable clan of a community. Such pages which don't fulfill WP:N gets deleted.Akalanka820 (talk) 12:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources in the article appear to be both significant and reliable. PiccklePiclePikel (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:RAJ, WP: RSCASTE, the refs are under those and anything else available is mostly not by the refs fulfilling WP:RS and also there is no WP:HISTRS ref. Please understand, it seems you are new user. Akalanka820 (talk) 13:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What issue do you have with Krishna Ballave Kumar Singh as a source? PiccklePiclePikel (talk) 17:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.