Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barhiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 06:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barhiya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that they meet WP:NOTABILITY. Possibly worth redirecting to Warya if they are the same, but not merging as this is unsourced. Boleyn (talk) 09:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~If not independently notable, merge to List of Rajput clans of Uttar Pradesh~~. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Struck above. No opinion at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the "list of clans" articles are gradually being pruned to those that meet WP:V and the spirit of WP:NLIST. Clan names often exist in more than one caste grouping and in more than one location, so accurate redirecting is impossible. Source checks suggest that this particular community does not appear to meet WP:GNG. - Sitush (talk) 16:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: appears to be failing WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 23:11, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- same rationale as Bargaiyan. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.