Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beni Ebeid SC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Beni Ebeid SC

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Govvy (talk) 13:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I merged some content into Beni Ebeid article. At the moment I don't see enough WP:SIGCOV for this football club to have it's own article. Unless I am proven wrong, I fail to see how this needs it's own page. Suggest a redirect to Beni Ebeid. Govvy (talk) 10:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Egypt. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 10:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - While I admit that the current state of this article isn't the best, but it definitely passes WP:NOTE; as it's about a club that played in a major national competition, the Egypt Cup, and were previously one step away from reaching the top domestic league in the country, the Egyptian Premier League.

There's also a lack of information in English language about this club, similar to other lower clubs from Egypt, so having a separate article for this and other similar clubs may be best for readers, to have at least a glimpse of information of that club. Nevertheless, I will try to update and rewrite the article in the nearest possible time to improve its state. Ben5218 (talk) 10:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you find and add Arabic-language sources to show notability? If so, please ping me. Otherwise delete due to lack of significant coverage. Giant Snowman 20:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been rewritten and significantly improved with new content and more sources in both Arabic and English languages. Ben5218 (talk) 14:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm with GiantSnowman here. While there may be Arabic-language sources, they are extremely difficult for non-Arabic speakers/readers to find. I am more than willing to change my vote if Arabic-language sources can be added, either here or, more preferably, in the article itself. Indeed, given the state of the article at the moment, this borders on WP:TNT. Anwegmann (talk) 23:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per sources included in reworked article. Anwegmann (talk) 21:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have updated and rewritten the article. Ben5218 (talk) 14:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Ben5218: That is actually a lot better, I don't mind saying it's closer to a Weak keep for me, there a a few delete arguments, so it would help if both @Anwegmann and GiantSnowman: are happy with the new updates or not for a withdrawal. Govvy (talk) 21:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping @Govvy. This is indeed much better. I've changed my vote above as a result. It's weak, but it's a keep. Anwegmann (talk) 21:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear that you liked the updated article! Once I have enough freetime, I'll do the same to the club's stadium article, Beni Ebeid Stadium, which is also nominated for deletion at the moment. That should happen today if everything goes right with my daily schedule. Ben5218 (talk) 06:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep following article improvement. Good work! Giant Snowman 09:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.