Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Lake, Saskatchewan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). VG ☎ 19:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Black Lake, Saskatchewan

~~Article does not assert notability using reliable, third-party sources. VG ☎ 08:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)~~ Sources have been added. VG ☎ 19:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Real, verifiable, settlement. That is the kind of topic traditionally cover, and Wikipedia should be no more restrictive. It is also a good idea to take a quick look for sources if you find it insufficient; try [1], and [2]. From this, it would appear that Black Lake is a fairly significant Indian settlement, with a perfectly interesting history. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as an actual settlement; remember that (1) a claim of being a settlment is a claim of notability, and (2) settlements are virtually always considered to be notable prima facie. Nyttend (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'd love to see more about Black Lake, but per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#Places there is broad consensus that verifiable places are inherently notable. Alansohn (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above.DCmacnut <> 16:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep ~~It clearly exists, nothing else matters~~ Bodies of water, like most settlements, are considered inherently notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It could use expansion. --Fremte (talk) 19:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.