Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinal Global Logistics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal Global Logistics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

complete PR spam about a run of the mill company that's sourced to WP:MILL content and press releases. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NCORP. References are mostly press releases with no WP:SECONDARY analysis or commentary. The remainder are self-published.This article was first created as a draft by Cardinal Marketing, deleted within the hour as G11, recreated a few days later by BenPritchard2703 only to be deleted again within the hour as G11, and lastly recreated by the current author, Mjjdbm, an SPA who has been asked to declare their connection with the company. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 05:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is a puff piece trying to masquerade as a Wikipedia article. TH1980 (talk) 04:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Setting aside the circumstances around its repeating creation, this article is little more than a list of acquisitions such as might be found on the News page of a corporate website, but which announcements fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. They describe a company going about its business, but without indicating a reason why it would be in an encyclopaedia. The sole claim which might indicate notability is that their Freight Calculator "disrupted the market " and became an industry standard: were this so, one might expect it to have been the subject of WP:RS coverage, but my searches are not finding that. No evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 10:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion Such-change47 (talk) 06:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Curb Safe Charmer's reasoning, none of the references meet NCORP's criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Also might want to delete Draft:Cardinal Global Logistics which has been recently created, probably as a work-around this AfD. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.