Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casual game (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow close, and likely a SK #2 as a disruptive AFD. -- ferret (talk) 22:00, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Reopening of the old Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casual game with new content.
Many AfD on the Mystery Case Files releated articles appear from time. So i decide that if everyone on Wikipedia want to delete or merge this articles. i would to the same with all the Casual Playing relate articles because every user use the prejudicial term "Run-of-the-Mill"" instead of ordinary or normal that are more respectful. The Casual Games releated source are classed Unreiliable so it obvious that the Casual Playing is not notable. I am also nominating the following related pages because Casual Game are Not Notable for Wikipedia:
- Big Fish Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- GameHouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Hidden Expedition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Delicious (video game series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Mystery Case Files (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Mystery Trackers (series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Dark Parables (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Candy Crush Saga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Dana Knightstone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Drawn (series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Fairway Solitaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Mystic Inn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Botanica (series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Alawar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Fishdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Otherworld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Gardenscapes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Ghost Whisperer (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Happy Farm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Homescapes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Antique Road Trip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Snow close clearly a retaliatory afd, not in good faith. --Masem (t) 21:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- ReOpen: These Articles are not notables and it's make in good faith.
- Keep Most (not all of the linked articles) are notable, and I would prefer individual AFD's for the not so notables. But the original Casual game article is a definite keep, as it is a massive game genre, which almost streches back to the beginning of gaming. Groig (talk) 21:33, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Casual Game is Not Notable and all articles on it must be delete because all sources are unreliable because they speak of Casual Game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.134.86 (talk) 21:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Um.. all sources should speak of the subject. Not sure what you are waffling about. Could I have some explanation? Groig (talk) 21:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- I say that if you think that not all must be deleted, say what you think should stay.72.10.134.86 (talk) 21:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.