Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre de services scolaire de la Beauce-Etchemin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 00:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Centre de services scolaire de la Beauce-Etchemin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing significant coverage. Per WP:SIGCOV: ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail". WP:BEFORE revealed nothing beyond WP:ROUTINE coverage that would contribute to demonstrating WP:N. // Timothy :: talk 19:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 19:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 19:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article has no citation sources and it has to be deleted. 50.92.118.160 (talk) 04:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Nom. Also, article title is not in English. -- Otr500 (talk) 03:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, because the only valid rationale provided in the subsequent delete !votes after the nomination is "per nom". This is not a biographical article, so having no "citation sources" is not applicable as a valid rationale for deletion, and an article title not being in English is also not a valid rationale.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, um, User:Northamerica1000, "this article is unsourced and the topic fails WP:GNG" is a completely legitimate deletion rationale biography or not. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NEXIST, "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". It is part of the main Wikipedia:Notability guideline page. As I stated, a non-BLP article lacking "citation sources", which I read to mean citation sources within the article, because citations are used to verify information within articles, is not a valid rationale for deletion, at least according to the consensus that has been formed as the main notability guideline page has been developed. Conversely, BLP articles that have no sources are deleteable with this rationale, as per WP:BLPPROD. Hope this clarifies matters. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Apparently this is a local school board, but there are no sources provided other than the school board's own web site. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.