Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinema of Ghana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:32, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema of Ghana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page appears to be a WP:COATRACK Meatsgains (talk) 01:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article's in a lousy state, but the topic is definitely notable.[1][2][3] Clarityfiend (talk) 05:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article has good sources it just needs further expansion. Dwanyewest (talk) 22:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Topic is clearly notable based on sources provided by Clarityfiend. AbstractIllusions (talk) 16:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a topic on national cinema in a particular country. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An inherently notable topic: virtually every country is going to have a national-level Cinema of Foo article at the very least. I also don't agree that this is could be deleted for COAT as several different people in the Ghanaian film sector are mentioned -- if one shouldn't be there, just remove the offending text.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.