[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complication (song) (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Complication (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG, as tagged since July 2015. The source in the article is not reliable. First AfD was closed as no consensus. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete With a song that didn't chart, wasn't nominated for awards and only recorded twice by the same artist it fails WP:NSONG and so I did not expect to find any sources to help it meet WP:GNG. I was not disappointed when I did my Google search and found nothing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Admittively, when I voted keep on the last AfD, I saw the song mentioned in Monks articles all the time (I was writing a GA for the band at the time). However, I now know that the song needs standalone sources to be considered notable. An obvious fail of WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguisttalk|contribs 11:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.