Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Sheppard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Sheppard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written as if subject is a politician (fails WP:NPOL anyway). To me, this seems like a candidate for public office that has decent coverage in the media, but doesn't seem notable. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Environment, and United Kingdom. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edited text and amended style to improve NPOV and aimed to focus on the notable action around COVID-19 local support group activism, added citations and removed some of the political details e.g. previous elections, replaced officeholder infobox, as she was not elected, with infobox-person. Others can decide if this has improved the article and if it passes re notability. Kaybeesquared (talk) 22:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:NPOL or WP:ANYBIO. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The politics bits could be removed, but she is still a notable woman campaigner, meeting the criteria for significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject mainly due to her work of Nunhead Knocks, and even after covid she is still mentioned in letters sent to Southwark residents in different topics such as mental health : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1teuJJrry9VAopE1xMEUtZnkFMf8x7Y0f/edi DrGonzalezRojas (talk) 23:58, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do not think that this meets the threshold for WP:ANYBIO. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.