Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Fenton (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Fenton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

businessleader.co.uk [1] and businessmondays.co.uk [2] contain no independent reporting, they seem to be copied from the same press release. company-information.service.gov.uk [3] is a primary source. fed.education [4], thedrum.com [5], School of Marketing [6], Steve Pugh [7], TEDx [8] are not independent. scribd [9] is self-published. Business Insider is a passing mention in a listing [10]. Only bdaily.co.uk [11] seems to be somewhat reliable (and still is probably from a press release). It does not seem to pass WP:GNG. MarioGom (talk) 05:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, United Kingdom, and Australia. MarioGom (talk) 05:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @MarioGom: just wondering why this is listed at the Australian deletion sorting list? AusLondonder (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AusLondonder: Sorry, I had a brain fart. It should have been New Zealand. MarioGom (talk) 14:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well they're both Down Under :) AusLondonder (talk) 14:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not seeing any SIGCOV from independent sources.-KH-1 (talk) 09:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not seeing any SIGCOV from independent sources.— NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 03:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability, per WP: GNG. Reads somewhat like WP:RESUME & WP:ADMASQ. NiklausGerard (talk) 02:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poorly sourced to the usual press release farms. No significant or in-depth coverage. AusLondonder (talk) 14:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.