Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Nicholls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:55, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Nicholls

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After cleaning up the sources for this page, it doesn't seem like there is much supporting any of the presenting career section or the article's notability. The remaining sources are largely primary and relating to the individual's personal life. Notability is unclear. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sadly there are is not enough significant coverage for the article to be kept. Trillfendi (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources now in the article, including a source in the article when it was nominated for deletion and since added as additional references, and additional sources added since the nomination, appear to verify WP:ENTERTAINER#1 notability, significant roles in multiple notable [...] television shows. Beccaynr (talk) 23:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:ENT per Beccaynr's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 04:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Now that additional sources have been added it meets WP:ENT and WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 15:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Beccaynr has done the leg work and the sourcing is now fairly reasonable. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There seems to be significant coverage of the subjects television work to establish notability. Dunarc (talk) 22:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:ENT criteria by being in multiple places, TV host, radio host, etc. Boredathome101 (talk) 03:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Now meets wp:gng MaskedSinger (talk) 12:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.