Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Declan Sheehan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declan Sheehan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Easily fails WP:GNG. One Super League appearance would technically pass WP:RLN, but I'm not sure he actually played in the game that the article claims anyway (he is not in the squad in this match report or the club's team news). J Mo 101 (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions. J Mo 101 (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Whilst meeting RLN or any other SNG is sufficient to keep without also needing to meet GNG, the evidence does not suggest he played the game he was alleged to have played and therefore neither RLN nor GNG are met. Stifle (talk) 10:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of notability without prejudice to recreation should his career revive, as he is still quite young. RobinCarmody (talk) 18:43, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.