Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dini Daniel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dini Daniel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress. All the references are from non reliable sources (the Hindu reference is a poem by somebody who could be the same person, though contributing a poem in a newspaper doesn't impart any notability). Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR in the absence of reliable sources. Jupitus Smart 07:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 07:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 07:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Perhaps some regional sources may exist that may convince me to change my !vote. My current search shows no reliable sources that can help push the subject over WP:GNG OR WP:NACTOR. Lourdes 09:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added some more links with rearranged it's links and I think there are enough notability now.Njaan Parayunnu (talk) 15:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Njaan Parayunnu, all sources you've added are unreliable. One is a video indexing site, the other two seem PR puff sites. Would you have any mainstream media source that has covered the subject? Warmly, Lourdes 14:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lourdes, I have added 3 links too, [1]-[2]-[3] and the following web links are enough to consider reliable sources to proof notability of an actor or a film-[4] and [5].Njaan Parayunnu (talk) 06:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Njaan. I would suggest that you should give a quick read to Reliable sources, a guideline that would assist you in understanding how sources can be classified as reliable. Let me quickly analyze your four sources:

https://www.m3db.com/artists/69941 : Has no significant content on the subject. Anyway, is made to look like IMDB; unreliable.
http://www.mathrubhumi.com/nri/america/news/cpr-class-1.1925836 : I ran this through Google Translate. This is an article about a low-key heart/medical class conducted. Has no mention of the subject; she appears in the picture.
http://keralatimes.com/?p=8180 : This is a link trap website. The home page of the website contains the following words: "android lollipop android smartphone Arsenal Boob Blast ..." and some hundred more words like that.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm8878820/ : IMDB sources are unreliable for supporting significance.

If you have any regional sources from reliable sources, please do list them. But first, please do go through WP:RS. Ask me for any assistance in understanding the guideline. Warmly, Lourdes 07:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.