Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Amy Lynn Bradley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep / withdrawn. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 01:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disappearance of Amy Lynn Bradley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As was noted in the AfD for Randy Leach see here, there's no notability save her disappearance. Unfortunate as her disappearance was, this article seems to meet all three conditions of WP:BLP1E Vertium (talk to me) 22:27, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article is not on Amy Lynn Bradley, the person, but on her disappearance, the event; an event which received national coverage and has periodic ongoing press updates. Therefore it should not fall under WP:BLP, but instead WP:EVENT, much like the Steve Bartman incident or the disapearances of Madeleine McCann, Rebecca Coriam, Kyron Horman, Edward and Austin Bryant, Susan Powell Suzy Lamplugh and a fair chunk of the recent entries on the List of people who disappeared mysteriously. The event of Amy's disappearance is notable through coverage on national TV through NBC, Dr. Phil and CNN - plus numerous mentions when the Natalee Holloway case is covered. --Yankees76 ^Talk 16:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - user Yankee pretty much covers it in his statement but I would like to add that the article passes WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This case passes the test of extensive and sustained coverage. I have added to the article evidence that the case has been featured by America's Most Wanted and Vanished. --MelanieN (talk) 22:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - Given the additional information, I withdraw this AfD. Thanks. Vertium ^{When all is said} _{and done} 23:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.