Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dobryi
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Trevor MacInnis contribs 00:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dobryi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entered in error as explained on the talk page. Benjamin Trovato (talk)
- Fixed — Rankiri (talk) 03:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - even the creator of the page doubts its notability. McMarcoP (talk) 08:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: unsourced. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-08-12t09:32z
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If the original nominator is pushing for deletion does that make this case csd eligable? TomStar81 (Talk) 11:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Criterion G7 requires the original author to be the only one to have added substantial content. There have been quite a few different editors who have contributed to the article, but I did not check to see how substantial their contributions were. This was because a WP:PROD has previously been contested and so it is not eligible for speedy deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 12:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:21, August 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Mr.TrustWorthy----Got Something to Tell Me? 23:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nomination - author believes that it was created in error. — AustralianRupert (talk) 01:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.