Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorcas Osei Sarfo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dorcas Osei Sarfo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The standard for notability under WP:PROF is worldwide, and she does not meet it. I support some degree of flexibility, but not to the extent of a chemist whose most cited papers have been cited no more than 11 times [1] DGG ( talk ) 20:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly a worthy person, but WP:Prof and WP:GNG are not satisfied. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Being the first Ghanaian female chemist is something that could plausibly make her notable, but only if there are independent reliable sources that actually note it and cover her in-depth, giving her a pass of WP:GNG. I don't see those sources, and I also don't see evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no where near passing the notability guidelines for chemists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.