Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Come, Easy Go (SATC episode)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (with creation of redirect to LoE) CitiCat ♫ 04:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Easy Come, Easy Go (SATC episode) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Single, unnotable episode of Sex and the City that fails WP:EPISODE and WP:FICTION. Nothing but a short plot summary and cast list. Merge unneeded as plot summary is already covered in List of Sex and the City episodes. Failed Prod. Collectonian (talk) 03:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
[reply]
- Why? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed to Delete per nomination ~NeonFire372~ (talk) 00:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, episode does not seem to have had any significance in the wider world, so it cannot "(offer) detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance" (from WP:NOT). Fails WP:FICTION. Lankiveil (talk) 03:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete - per WP:EPISODE, which, while a guideline, states that episodes are not exempt from WP:N, which this does not appear to meet. LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable episode. Ridernyc (talk) 05:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the LoE per WP:EPISODE. Silver Sonic Shadow (talk) 04:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the LoE with no prejudice against recreation if sources for "real-world" information are found. Ursasapien (talk) 07:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.