[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Oduro Osae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Oduro Osae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another BLP that’s been sitting at the back of the NPP queue for weeks. There are plenty of refs but nevertheless it’s doubtful that’s the subject is notable. Bringing to AfD for consensus. Mccapra (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Obengjennifer: could you provide three links to good examples of this please? Mccapra (talk) 03:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mccapra: Below are three links to articles about interviews he has had.
https://www.peacefmonline.com/pages/politics/politics/202101/436327.php
https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/85-ministers-good-but-you-could-have-reduced-further-Oduro-Osae-to-Akufo-Addo-1161637
https://www.graphic.com.gh/news/general-news/ghana-news-don-t-misappropriate-state-funds-dr-osae-urges-internal-auditors.html
--Obengjennifer (talk) 11:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. This article may pass GNG so we’ll see what other editors think. Mccapra (talk) 12:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep The subject is notable and somehow meets WP:GNG But the whole article must be well streamlined, The subject in question even is an academic as well as a local governance commentator he is mostly on radio and television giving commentary or comments on governance and other aspects, better reliable sources have to be used in the article as some of the sources may not be considered as reliable enough in my opinion. The most reliable ones must be used and not just be put there just because of mere mentions, if not then any article can be put on wikipedia. Thats my opinion. Thanks Ampimd (talk) 00:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:NPOL. He appears to be what we call an inspector general in the United States. Bearian (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.