Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil Eyes (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evil Eyes (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was on edge of Csd figured this would be better, does not yet appear to meet WP:BAND , not seeing signed by major label, significant coverage, national tours etc. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. smtchahal^(talk) 15:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Short of WP:Music overall, minimal media coverage.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 11:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Personally, I wouldn't have CSDed it, but I see where you're coming from. I have friends that have also been played on radio 6 and so on, but this does not mean they meet the notability criteria.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 14:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.