Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failatu Abdul-Razak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The policy-based consensus is clear. Star Mississippi 14:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Failatu Abdul-Razak

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be notable for only one thing (WP:BLP1E), which is attempting to break the world record, but she didn't manage to do that. The rest of the article is also promotional in tone. ... discospinster _talk 00:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 00:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Businesspeople. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct; the tone of the article is promotional. A complete overhaul is necessary. Instead of deleting it, I suggest we undertake a comprehensive revision to address the promotional aspects and improve its overall quality. Ihikky (talk) 12:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Looks like he just recently broke records. Article is certainly promotional + refspam, so cleanup is needed. But I think recent events since the nomination help tip it over the edge. TLA (talk) 02:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article says that she "appears to have broken the record", and they will send the evidence to Guinness World Records. Also, Guinness World Records is no longer an example of notability on its own, since it now allows anyone to create a world record for themselves for promotional purposes. ... discospinster _talk 17:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- bkeep article and allow for improvement in tone.CoachAni (talk) 23:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC) — CoachAni (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep article for further improvements Ruby D-Brown (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very good Asamoah Daniel Kwame Oware (talk) 17:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Although except for nom there are only "keep" arguments, they are weaker than the nomination statement and counter-argument. I do not see consensus for "delete" so I am relisting in hopes of more in-depth discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete or normal delete as irredeemably promotional. "Many orphans have received food from Faila and her colleagues at their restaurant, bringing happiness and smiles to their faces, all thanks to the non-profit". Any article written along these lines needs WP:TNT and rewriting from scratch by uninvolved editors. Sandstein 20:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.