Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Football at the 2009 Maccabiah Games – Men's team squads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Football at the 2009 Maccabiah Games – Men's team squads

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Full of red links, and fails WP:SPORTS Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sports, South Africa, Israel, France, Germany, Russia, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Venezuela. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The Football at the 2009 Maccabiah Games – Women's team squads should be included too. I don't see any other football squads for other editions of the Maccabiah Games. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The women's squads are being discussed already at a separate AFD: here. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

D'oh! Didn't see that big AfD tag at the top of the page... Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not needed, same reasons as for the women's squads. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable list. Giant Snowman 09:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Probably delete The way I see it, it's overkill on information. I'd say the actual games are more than notable and even Football at the 2009 Maccabiah Games can probably be sorted out if the correct sources are found. Jewish Chronicle, Jewish News and other related newspapers across the world relating to the Jewish community would have covered parts of the events, thus this would build the coverage. Govvy (talk) 11:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my reasons at the women's squads AfD Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If this had been completed, it could conceivably have been merged up, while hidden. But it hasn't been completed. So a discussion is not necessary. So many articles get prodded while they shouldn't. This is the opposite case. It's unlikely that anyone will object to delete. WP:SNOW also applies. gidonb (talk) 15:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PROD is useless system, as someone can come along 5 years later and request undeletion without giving any reasons. And then we'd have to undelete it then. Also, random new/IP editors, or the article creators, usually just remove PRODs, so it would end up at AFD anyway. Joseph2302 (talk)

You mean that this person will be back to complete their project? Unlikely. I agree that PROD is overused. Lately I have seen a lot of prodding where discussions are likely and articles were eventually kept. But, sure, all of the above! gidonb (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.