Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frontbench Team of Jeffrey Donaldson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Democratic Unionist Party#Party spokespersons at Westminster. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:17, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Frontbench Team of Jeffrey Donaldson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not think that this particular group of people meets WP:NLIST. It appears to list every member of the DUP in Commons and declares them to be the frontbench team. I'm not really able to find in-depth sources that refer to the group of people in this way rather than referring them much more plainly by stating that they are the DUP members of the Parliament or as the various spokespeople. As a result, I'm inclined to redirect this article to Democratic Unionist Party#Party spokespersons at Westminster, where this can be covered in sufficient depth in the context of the DUP as a whole. — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. it's only linked from one page here. Chumpih. (talk) 08:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Mhawk10 - Just FYI: AFD is for deletion discussions so we usually don't propose redirects here unless folks chiming in suggest it as an alternative to deletion. You can propose and discuss redirects at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. For non-controversial cases, place a technical request; if a discussion is required, then start a requested move. Happy holidays. Missvain (talk) 21:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Missvain: No. A proposal to blank and redirect a page can be brought to AfD, especially if the proposed WP:BLAR might be controversial. — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. RFD is for discussing existing redirects and wouldn't be the place for this. Reywas92^Talk 14:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.