Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franklin Egobi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:16, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Franklin Egobi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer that fails WP:NBOX. My BEFORE search only came up with two sources. Ignoring the fact that it's strictly local coverage, they're both by the same author, so it's to be treated as one source for notability purposes. One source with significant coverage for a non-notable boxer who retired in 2012 doesn't satisfy WP:GNG in my opinion. – ².O.^Boxing 21:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing, Nigeria, and United Kingdom. ².O.^Boxing 21:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NBOX and lacks the coverage to meet the GNG.Sandals2 (talk) 22:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 22:19, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to meet WP:NBOX. Except for some local coverage, I didn't find significant independent coverage to show he meets WP:GNG. Talk of a world title shot was just the usual dream for fighters. All I saw were passing mentions, fight results, and database entries. Papaursa (talk) 23:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.