Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greensborough Plaza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Greensborough Plaza

The result of the discussion is Keep per WP:SNOW and also all said keep or speedy keep. Non-admin closure.--JForget 01:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another non-notable shopping center from the same user... Bullzeye^{(Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts)} 09:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, 100+ stores, numerous anchors, multi-level, quite a bit of discussion on Google, and a website that's based upon Lotus Notes for some bizarre reason? Notable. Needs cleanup, not deletion. Lankiveil 12:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 12:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Lankiveil :: maelgwn - talk 13:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Not withstanding that the article is now a well-structured ~~stub with appropriate references~~ start class article overflowing with references, it ~~seems to be a~~ is a notable centre with a very significant history and the subject of multiple reliable independent sources. And as per Lankiveil, AfD is not for cleanup. ~~Thewinchester ^(talk) 13:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)~~ Thewinchester ^(talk) 17:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:Thewinchester Taprobanus 15:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep 16-odd reliables decent history/controversy section. Seems to follow WP:SHOP quite well. V/good article. easy passes notability. Twenty Years 17:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - subject is clearly notable, many reliable sources cited, article has been transformed since nomination. Orderinchaos 17:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball keep and close, very obviously re-written, perfectly serviceable article. Passes WP:RS with flying colors. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 18:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and close. Good article, well sourced, easily passes notability. Rebecca 01:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Large shopping centres are notable especially if they had 75-100 + stores or is very very large in surface.--JForget 01:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.