Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Brocklebank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:07, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Brocklebank

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. The Harper's source is the only cite that might serve to establish notability, and I would argue it's really too weak to do so. These lists of putative movers and shakers are often very shonky.TheLongTone (talk) 14:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no notability per WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. --Morpho achilles (talk) 14:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Plenty of mentions in the press, mostly interviews or her commenting on something or another. I'm unable to find any sources about her directly. Oaktree b (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: And the page is also quite non-neutral to me when I reviewed it as an NPR, which is why I placed a neutrality template on it. Thanks, NotReallySoroka (talk) 22:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find any direct information on her either and consider it not notable. Kazanstyle (talk) 17:09, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.