Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotel Korpilampi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Happy to draftify if someone wants it. Let me know. Missvain (talk) 01:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Korpilampi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD and BEFORE showed nothing that meets RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Article provides no indication of notability. // Timothy :: talk 18:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 18:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 18:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The article in Finnish seems to have some sources? I don't read Finnish though. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 22:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll give it a go. Korpilampi is a bit of an iconic one, there should be decent enough references (in addition to whatever the Finnish wiki has). I agree, though, that as it stands, the article does make a poor fist of it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - I was already half way into improving and expanding the article, when my browser crashed and I seem to have lost the work irretrievably. :( That said, I did discover that finding decent sources wasn't quite as easy as I first thought, so I might just have to let this one go. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are a number of references on the Finnish page - have these been looked at? SportingFlyer T·C 17:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most of them are dead. I only found one good article on the hotel that wasn't a directory listing, but it has an important place in Finnish political history, so may well be notable if Finnish archives are searched. SportingFlyer T·C 00:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - there's fair reason to believe that this topic is notable but the article does not demonstrate that at all. I would suggest sending to draft space so that a user with good experience of using Finnish sources can work on it Spiderone 08:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- If this does get draftified (or kept), I undertake to add whatever decent sources I could find, and generally rework it. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only hint of significant coverage I was able to find is about events taking place at this venue, not about the hotel itself. I don't think there's ever been a consensus that venues WP:INHERIT notability from notable events held there. The remaining coverage is simply what you'd expect for any hotel (booking sites, etc.) Draftifying is only appropriate if there is a reasonable likelihood of improvement which I don't see here. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable and no significant coverage. Expertwikiguy (talk) 00:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.