Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iszoloscope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iszoloscope

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and tagged for notability since 2012. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 19:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar 19:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Only source on page is the band's website. Meatsgains (talk) 21:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not at all convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ad Noiseam as a possible search term. Delete - never mind, there's no primary record label as a target here. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 22:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.