Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JAKAZiD (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JAKAZiD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:N. Beyond one brief mention in a 2006 Guardian article there are insufficient citations to establish notability and verifiability. Coldupnorth (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Fifteen years on from a momentary minor notice for a video; nothing noteworthy since. Plutonium27 (talk) 23:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Could not find significant coverage so appears to fall foul of WP:SUSTAINED. Chumpih t 08:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.