Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Zubairi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Zubairi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically a CV for a theatre actor and TV extra. A mention in a theatre review is not sufficient to establish any notability for this guy. Time for the article to go. Sionk (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I'm not seeing a good target for moving elsewhere; my searches found nothing outstandingly good aside from this passing mention and other mentions here and here. Even a look at his IMDb sums it so if there's not much at IMDb, there's not much for Wiki in most cases. SwisterTwister talk 18:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 13:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No claim made about notability. Darx9url (talk) 08:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.