Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamovi
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Jamovi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to be a notable software. Google only returns non-RS hits, and the sources in the article are either blogs or the download page. In short: fails WP:GNG. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I found no notability. SL93 (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I was researching this and was also going to AfD. Pet-projects aren't allowed on wiki, much less ones that don't pass WP:GNG. Best, Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 10:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as I too cannot find notability in the sources. Hyperbolick (talk) 16:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - No significant reliable coverage.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.