Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice Ofori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 01:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Justice Ofori

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to meet WP:GNG. Contested prod (see article's talk page). But presidential appointees don't satisfy WP:NPOL, which clearly say they must be elected. Not a cabinet level position (see Cabinet of Nana Akufo-Addo). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in WP:NPOL says that politicians must be elected to qualify. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Justice Ofori is the Commissioner of Insurance in Ghana a very high profile Government of Ghana position which the person is nominated directly by the president to that office. This person meets WP:NPOL since his office is tied to the tenure of the president of the republic of Ghana. This makes the subject meet WP:GNG, I am at a loss why you claim he is not notable with the abundance of third party sources we have provided. The organization he heads is a very reputable Government of Ghana agency which regulates Insurance in Ghana. I shudder to think a head of such institution which is a constitutional body can not be said to meet WP:NPOL. Owula kpakpo (talk) 15:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Many, many hits in Google, not sure which ones are considered reliable sources for Ghana. Oaktree b (talk) 19:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 11:19, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.