[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaya (Canadian singer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 07:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kaya (Canadian singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears non-notable. A search for sources seems to turn up mainly other bios based on this one. --Mdann52talk to me! 12:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 14:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 14:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for non-notability. The poor guy doesn't even have enough fans to edit the article, he is doing it all for himself.[1][2] - SweetNightmares 16:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "official website" is just product advertisement (aimed at the very very gullible): "His philanthropy, exemplary devotion, and humanitarian aid have become a source of inspiration for millions of people on the planet.". :) Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 01:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Official websites" are almost always for promotional purposes — that's the very nature of the beast, and its why we don't accept them as sufficient referencing in and of themselves to support encyclopedia articles. But the fact that his own website is promotional is irrelevant, if the reliable sourcing is present to counter its advertorial tendencies with neutral content — and as of now, that sourcing is present. Bearcat (talk) 01:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You've convinced me. Keep, then. Here's a list of the awards and references:
  • 1993 - Male Vocalist of the Year[4]
  • 1993 - Best Selling Francophone Album[5]
  • 1991 - Most Promising Male Vocalist of the Year[6]
- SweetNightmares 17:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update: I've added quite a bit of referencing — certainly some more would still be a good idea, but the challenge is that I don't have access to a database archive of French-language media from the 1990s (which is when the largest amount of coverage of him would have been published), so I have to rely mainly on web-accessible sources for the moment — and have toned down some of the promotional language and the trivia. One problem I'm still having is that while I'm finding a lot of general acknowledgements that he recorded two unsuccessful albums before his commercial breakthrough, I'm not finding hide nor hair of their titles (there's one pre-Drôle album credited to him by discogs.com, but for a variety of reasons I'm not confident enough that it's really him, rather than a different musician who merely happened to have the same name, to add it here without another source for confirmation.) However, even as a still imperfect work in progress it's in considerably better shape than it was at the time of nomination. Bearcat (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry,for the record, this was a request sent in by OTRS, however, that should not affect your !votes at all :) --Mdann52talk to me! 06:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.