Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobla Ladzekpo
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep (weakly). Daniel (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kobla Ladzekpo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
At present, the article doesn't indicate that Kobla Ladzekpo meets NBIO, [WP:NMUSIC
- Comment: This mention in the New York Times [1] and this [2] seem to hint at notability, I'll keep looking. Oaktree b (talk) 18:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Bands and musicians, Dance, Ghana, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep — There are sources, such as this Los Angeles Times, that are significant enough for the subject to meet WP:GNG. Shoerack (talk) 09:56, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 19:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep just enough with the sources above. Oaktree b (talk) 20:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep Is notable, but poorly. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.