Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Alisharan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 15:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Alisharan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This actor has only had one major role and I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 (talk) 02:39, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. GNews gives only local stories (about him becoming a student). Even the celebrity gossip sites have almost nothing on him. I would have thought that a mojor role would lead to notability, but it seems not to be the case.08:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 16:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 03:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no sources, apparently none to be found except for his study-related activities (and that's a single local paper, for all I can tell). Huon (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Notability questionable, two years of article and no content. -- billinghurst (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, the notability for this person does not exist. Hence the lack of sources. JBsupreme (talk) 02:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.