Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LA Music Blog
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- LA Music Blog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination (changed to delete, below). This has existed for a few weeks now, and I'm not convinced it is a notable website. References include other blogs, and it seems the site is trying to gain notability because of that large blue-linked second paragraph that includes all the artist who have been reviewed by the blog. I'm absolutely neutral here, but this article doesn't give me good feelings. — Timneu22 · talk 18:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The article satisfies the requirement in that it is a notable music entertainment blog within the Los Angeles area. The list of interviews has been significantly shortened and the article has been bolstered with facts regarding its history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Medusavirus (talk • contribs) 00:20, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It does not appear that any of the references shown actually discuss this website. — Timneu22 · talk 20:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence it satisfies WP:WEB. References are poor. Christopher Connor (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Nominator. — Timneu22 · talk 20:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.