Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lampix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 10:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lampix

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article. No evidence of passing WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. Closest I can find to RSes are a few promotional publicity pieces at launch - no independent third-party coverage meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. A WP:BEFORE overwhelmingly shows non-RS coverage of Lampix' failed cryptocurrency ICO. The most notable sources are those showing the founder being banned from being a company director, not anything about Lampix. David Gerard (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Per rationale by David Gerard. This mirrors the exact problem I have here, & just as this scenario, WP:NCORP is simply not met. Celestina007 (talk) 01:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacking indepth coverage to meet WP:NCORP. LibStar (talk) 23:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.