Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Sings the News
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. I'm not listing this as a keep because of the WP:ILIKEIT type keep arguments given. So the best thing to do for now is let it go and see if it can be improved, or if it fares differently next time. CitiCat ♫ 04:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lady Sings the News (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested redirect. Article is nothing more then an original research plot summary for a non-notable episode. Ridernyc (talk) 05:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Good page. Adreamtonight (talk) 05:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I suppose as a closing episode for the series, it might have some special significance attached. While WP:EPISODE appears to be in a contested state, this particular article really doesn't meet any special significance, beyond being the final episode of the series. Yngvarr 11:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not only is it the last episode, it is written very well, and is good enough to keep.
Limetolime (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Being well-written is not a criterion for keeping or deleting. Again, while WP:EPISODE is being disputed, the notability guide-lines beyond WP:EPISODE still apply. There are no references provided. Has this episode won any major awards, or has it received any significant coverage? The article is written as a plot summary, and there is a smattering of original research in both the intro and exit paragraphs. Yngvarr 21:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Well written, I think its an OK to keep this one --♫Twinkler4♫ (Talk to me!) 22:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article is currently not in very good shape, but I think it has true potential. It already has a smattering of "real-world" information and I think there should be enough available for real improvement. If this turns out to be the final episode of the series, I think it will be notable and widely written about. Ursasapien (talk) 07:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- nice to know we know only have to think something might be notable someday. Ridernyc (talk) 07:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.