Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leadhills Golf Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Leadhills#Golf course. Any content that anyone wants to merge is in the history. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leadhills Golf Club

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG. All the sources provided are not reliable or just passing mentioned. To pass GNG singnificant coverage of independent, reliable sources are needed and the sources need to talk about the subject in depth and in length and not just passing mentioned. Note: page was created by sock and was rejected 3 times by admins in draft and user MarleneSli moved the page to main space) Cassiopeia talk 20:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Golf and United Kingdom. Cassiopeia talk 20:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - UPE spam for a non-notable golf course. Cabayi (talk) 06:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Just a run of the mill golf course. LibStar (talk) 06:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Leadhills#Golf course (where it is mentioned) per WP:ATD. Only claim to notability seems to be it's position as the highest above sea level in Scotland, but overall it lacks significant coverage and there is insufficient content for a standalone article. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 10:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Leadhills#Golf course. There's not all that much content that would be worth bringing over (especially owing to WP:BALASP), so if there is any merge it should be careful to not import too much material from the source article to the target. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.