Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Grand Slam Men's Singles champions (reverse chronological order)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wow. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Grand Slam Men's Singles champions (reverse chronological order)[edit]
- List of Grand Slam Men's Singles champions (reverse chronological order) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The list already appears on a chronological order here, including some more stats and trivia. There's no reason to have the list appear twice, is there? Last PROD was deleted, so I have to use AfD RaLo18 (talk with me • my contributions) 14:00, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. No need for duplicative article that differ only in order. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm not much for lists anyway. But even setting that aside, the only difference between the lists is the order. -- Logical Premise Ergo? 14:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, duplicate list. Haven't these people heard of wikitable sortable? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Jmundo 21:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The mind boggles. Ten Pound Hammer, are you able to make the table in the main article sortable for them, so they're not tempted to recreate this? Fences and windows (talk) 23:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Most of them already are, oddly enough. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.