Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Poles killed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Poles killed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTMEMORIAL, that Poles have been killed (and their number) can be mentioned on a general page about the role of Poland in the event, but a list of the individuals that died is no more warranted than lists of people who died in airplane crashes (or e.g. WWII). Fram (talk) 07:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Military, Poland, Russia, and Ukraine. Fram (talk) 07:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are already other lists on Wikipedia of foreign volunteers who have been killed in various conflicts throughout history Salfanto (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Many sources this article uses are unsuitable, such as Twitter and Facebook. I can't vouch for some of the Polish sources, as my familiarity with Polish media is limited. I can't see from the sources whether or not these volunteers are notable for anything other than having died in Ukraine either. If so, they should be mentioned on a different page. However, I'm not sure which one. Maybe International Legion (Ukraine)? Cortador (talk) 10:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Some OR concerns, sure. Does it meet NLIST? There is some media coverage discussing more than one person (so, group - a list) that may suffice for NLIST: [1] (Gazeta Wyborcza), [2] (pl:dziennik.pl), [3] (defence24.pl, no wiki article yet, but IMHO notable). And there is also coverage of related fake news that should be mentioned in the article ([4]). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Covered by media sources, lessens the conflict's main casualties article size by branching out. Self-published sources can be replaced with mainstream ones/RS. EkoGraf (talk) 19:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article needed more work. Low tier sources or unreliable removed, added reliable Polish and Ukrainian sources. Is easy and lazy to call for a deletion of a page because you dont find 3 or 4 RS. Instead the OP should ask for help. Thats all.Mr.User200 (talk) 00:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.