Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pringles products
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Merge was considered, but given that none of these flavours are cited anywhere, I decided not to. This isn't to say that cited information on flavours cannot be added to Pringles at a later date. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:56, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Pringles products (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I know this list may be useful, but I don't think encyclopedias need a list like this, in the case of listing flavors of snack products. This is one of the lists that do not have a place in an encyclopedia. Mythdon (talk) 08:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a valid piece of information, just as much as the list of Coca-Cola varieties is in the article for said product. Does it need its own article? Probably not. Could it stand to be integrated into the main Pringles article? Definitely. --70.236.71.244 (talk) 09:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I will take your opinion as merge then. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 12:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to main Pringles article, which is pretty short. VG ☎ 04:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No verification. People can add some pretty silly flavors to this list without question, especially in smaller foreign countries. Any flavors for which a source can be found, (press release, Quarterly report, whatever) can be added to the Pringles article (so, possible partial merge vote, I guess). -Verdatum (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and merge Topic is probably a weak notable but the article lacks any citations and probably contains WP:OR. Any particularly notable flavours/products (with citations of course) could be added to the main article. MvjsTalking 08:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.