Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Transfers for Torneo Apertura Chileno 2007

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 03:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Transfers for Torneo Apertura Chileno 2007

Seems like a rather clear-cut WP:NOTDIR violation. Biruitorul ^Talk 03:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Many such lists exist, I guess, but that's not to say they should. I for one am concerned about the total lack of references. Punkmorten (talk) 19:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOT#STATS, wikipedia isn't a sports alamac. Secret ^account 14:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there is precedent for this kind of list, see List of Italian football transfers Summer 2007, List of English football transfers summer 2007, List of transfers of La Liga - 2007–08 season. Deleting this one while the articles for the European leagues are kept would seem a little unfair, although I believe that these articles should be properly sourced and this isn't. King of the North East 02:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as KOTNE correctly points out, league transfer articles are considered acceptable, and therefore the article needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 01:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per KOTNE and GS. – Pee Jay 02:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.