Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louisa Ansong Satekla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Louisa Ansong Satekla

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable fashion entrepreneur who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her. A before search turns up nothing. Two third of the sources used in the article are about her husband who is indeed notable but notability is not WP:INHERITED via proxy to a notable person. WP:ANYBIO is also not met. Celestina007 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The references in the article that mention her husband are about the couple, not just him. There are at least two references that are just about her as a dentist. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment— There are 3 actually and all of which do not satisfy what is contained in WP:GNG, GNG requires WP:SIGCOV and I do not see how it is met but, please by all means please could you provide any sources that demonstrate or show notability? That is, the sources you provide should discuss her in in-depth significant coverage independent of her.

In fact why don’t I analyze all “three” sources you make reference to, starting with this (SIGCOV isn’t met) and this (a top ten things you didn’t know about list article from an unreliable source)and finally this (which is a press release with 0 in-depth 0 SIGCOV and reads like an announcement) Celestina007 (talk) 14:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Aside the fact that most of the articles that mention her husband are entirely about the couple, there is significant web articles that centre focus on Louisa herself. These are indeed multiple independent sources. This satisfies WP:BASIC.Itspoojkins (talk) 23:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)This editor has now been blocked for possible UPE. Celestina007 (talk) 21:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — The editor above is the creator of this article. Furthermore merely saying they are notable without substantiating this statement with sources would not be considered as it largely constitutes WP:ATA in an AFD. So please bring those sources and I’d analyze them like I did for the sources provided by the other editor above. Celestina007 (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No significant coverage in reliable sources demonstrated so far. MarioGom (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - Passes WP:GNG As per significant coverage in multiple reliable sources including The Ghanaian Times, ModernGhana, News Ghana, GhanaWeb, and more. It's quite hard to get coverage in these sources especially in African countries. These are well-known newspapers and magazines in Ghana especially The Ghanaian Times, ModernGhana, Daily Graphic, News Ghana, Yen, GhanaWeb. See [|here] Richloveburner (talk) 17:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — I’m afraid you do not comprehend our policy on notability. The bane or, rather core of this nomination is on the fact that almost every source that discuss her do not meet WP:SIGCOV as she is mostly mentioned in connection to her marriage to a very notable person. Thus notability isn’t WP:INHERITED. In any case you are more than welcome to link to this AFD any source (even if it is just one) that is independent for of the subject, satisfies WP:SIGCOV and WP:INDEPTH please do so, if not I’m afraid this !vote may not be considered. Furthermore I saw your link above (this one) and that is archetypal example of mere announcements or a cluster of press releases(take note of this for future purposes) A cluster of press releases are what we refer to as “churnalism” which doesn’t constitute notability. Celestina007 (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007 as requested for, below are some independent sources of the entity to confirm notability: 1. https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/Dr-Louisa-Ansong-Satekla-demonstrates-ideal-tooth-brushing-technique-for-oral-hygiene-1224703 2. https://daughtersofafrica.org/8-things-know-dr-louisa-ansong/ 3. https://espact.com/meet-the-young-ghanaian-doctor-who-won-19-out-of-20-awards/4. https://www.modernghana.com/news/715572/2-ladies-sweep-knust-medical-awards.html 5. https://www.graphic.com.gh/news/general-news/knust-graduating-female-medical-student-wins-13-awards.html Richloveburner (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The first is a press release / sponsored post The second source has no reputation for fact checking neither is there any editorial oversight. The third source doesn’t meet WP:SIGCOV The fourth source which I already analyzed above fails to meet SIGCOV also and the fifth source mentions her in passing thus SIGCOV isn’t met. What am I missing? Celestina007 (talk) 18:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007 thanks for the education Richloveburner (talk) 09:06, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She is a dentist who happens to be married to a notable music performer. Notability is not inherited. Celestina007's analysis of the sources is correct. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 15:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NOTINHERITED - the articles are really about her husband, not about this obscure dentist. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not seeing significant coverage of the subject in independent, reliable sources. Woodroar (talk) 22:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.