Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovifm music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovifm.com ( Radio ). Continued block evasion by serial sockpuppeteer User:Alex9777777. Super Mario Man ( Talk ) 13:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lovifm music

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Had nominated for speedy under A7, anonymous IP user removed, am now moving to AfD, see talk page for the list of previous titles under which this company has attempted to insert itself into Wikipedia. KDS4444^Talk 08:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC) KDS4444^Talk 08:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Lovifm Music-Article should not be deleted !!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.120.16.55 (talk) 20:54, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unlike its predecessors, Lovifm.com music, Lovifm.com ( Radio ), Lovifm (Blogs), Aleksej Pechkurov ( Radio Lovifm ), Lovifm radio, and Lovifm Music (capital M on "music"). Because why? KDS4444^Talk 01:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Article should not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.45.1.207 (talk) 20:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Article for Wikipedia ! Lovifm music -do not delete. Article for Wikipedia ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.120.138.189 (talk) 04:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
good article Lovifm music -do not delete. Article for Wikipedia ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natali Avdeithik (talk • contribs) 04:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unlike previous articles Lovifm, this article is more complete , and it should remain in Wikipedia !!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natali Avdeithik (talk • contribs) 04:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC) — Natali Avdeithik (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The true art of the real site and a man ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.45.9.97 (talk) 07:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: as KDS4444 notes above, this article has previously been created under a range of titles, by a range of user accounts --- previous creations have all been by identified sockpuppets of Alex9777777 -- see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alex9777777/Archive. Based on this evidence, I have listed the creator of this article at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alex9777777 for investigation since I suspect this may be the same individual re-publishing this material. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 08:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added information in article, good article — Preceding unsigned comment added by JenniferMari-Gardner (talk • contribs)

Delete. Unremarkable app whose articles seems meant to promote it. No independent sources have been offered to indicate how it is notable; there also seems to be a sock working to keep this here and/or users of the app have been directed to come here. 331dot (talk) 11:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not appear notable; no Google results except personal playlists and Wikipedia. Not all of the article makes much sense in any case. Speedy deletion criterion A7 (no assertion of notability) may apply. -- Bad Weather 2014 ^{My work • What's wrong?} 11:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as G5/A7 - article about web content with no claim of significance, apparently created by a block-evading self-promoter. --McGeddon (talk) 12:13, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.