Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Low-Rate Voip
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Betamax (VoIP company). Given the product relationship, this looks like the better redirect. MBisanz talk 21:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Low-Rate Voip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability not asserted, unable to find anything which demonstrates or asserts notability. — neuro(talk) 13:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Voice over Internet Protocol as a plausible search term, since it can also be used as a concept. But nothing indicates WP:N fulfillment here. -Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 14:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I don't believe that this article should be deleted nor moved, because it is a famous program, and I wondered why wikipedia doesn't have an article about it, for me deleting this article is really a mistake. — Megahmad(talk) 13:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (OR Redirect to Voip as 2nd vote(per lilac soul)) There is no notablity to this article whatsoever, I see no evidence of it as a "famous" program, and it's a stub that just wastes space. I think we should delete but if we dont then a redirect, this isn't worth keeping Mczack26 SpeakToMe! 16:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Was asked by megahmad why I said delete on my Talk Page, this was my reply
- Hello, i'm not really sure what you wanted me to explain but I'll explain it agian anyway. The article Low-Rate Voip is neumerous in issues which no-one seems to've fixed. I has no refrences/citations and is a stub. I also dont consider the program to be particularly notable, skype is something I would consider notable. Feel free to improve the article and i will Strike my previuos vote and dont worry about leaving a message on my talk page, thats what it's there for. Mczack26 SpeakToMe! 16:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 16:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reference of notability -- ErnestVoice (User) (Talk) 16:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have no idea why it is for deletion! Wikipedia has about it all! don't delete it. Lighteroflife (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ernestvoice (talk • contribs) [reply]
- That's not much of an argument. Possible WP:STUFF -- ErnestVoice (User) (Talk) 18:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you put in for a checkuser? Mczack26 SpeakToMe! 17:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - if it were a famous program, then there would be reliable sources to back up this assertion. I've been unable to find any. -- Whpq (talk) 18:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge content to Betamax (VoIP company), since its one of their services with just a different retail label. —IncidentFlux [ TalkBack | Contributions ] 16:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.