Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M'ViTim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

M'ViTim

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline G11 Promotional non notable article created by a PR firm. The subject of the article is a musician but fails to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO and generally lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. A before such links me to sponsored posts, self published sources and user generated sources all of which can not be used in establishing notability. Celestina007 (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just a PR work. Does not fit the notability guideline — Preceding unsigned comment added by Applehead1000 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' The tone of the article, let alone the content, is promotional in nature. Does not appear to have many hits on Google or YouTube to satisfy notability guidelines. doktorb _words^deeds 04:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' Yes, the tone of the article, let alone the content, is promotional in nature. Written like a promotional blurb, as per nom. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.